Our
Prime Minister kept short of explicitly saying that our civilisation was
superior to the Muslim one but I dare say the gist of his speech could not be
lost on his audience. His opinion caused a furore among the Muslim community at
home and abroad and among the opposition. A few days later Berlusconi received
the ambassadors of Muslim countries and he had to set the record straight on
the matter and recant his "heresy". And who do you think was at the
head of the delegation? None other than the so-called "ambassador of Saudi
Arabia" (he only represents the Saudi family in fact; I think he himself
is a member of that family that have been misruling the country for the past 80
years!). Just imagine an Alice-in-Wonderland upside-,down world where the prime
minister of a civilised country has to explain his conduct and apologise for
his words (highly politically incorrect, one must admit!) to a self-styled
ambassador of a country that has the worst possible record as far as civil
rights are concerned; a country in which 15 young girls are left to burn alive
inside a school engulfed in flames because they are not able to put on the whatever-they-call-it
women are supposed to wear outside their homes! The horrific episode, which ironically
came a few months after Beriusconi's speech, was kept hush hush (to use a
colloquialism) by the Saudi press but it eventually leaked out to the
newspapers and sent a chill through every sane person the world over. Now the
representatives of that civilisation would have us believe in its superiority
to ours and to corroborate their claim they refer us to the history of Moorish
Spain. In your essay you provided ample evidence that tolerance, respect for
the individual and learning were limited to a short period of time and that
learning flourished, not because of but in spite of Islam.
George W. Bush and other heads of state in their public declarations are always
insisting on this point: ours is not a religious war. Muslims, who know better,
know that it is precisely that: a clash between religions and civilisations.
The fact is that Islam is not a religion or rather it is not only a religion:
it is much more than that. Muhammad wanted the various warring tribes of Arabia
to leave paganism and unite politically and to that end he created a religion
which was a syncretic creation between Judaism and the Christian faith. Since
its very inception Islam has had this main purpose: controlling people's minds
and direct them towards religious and political ends. Islam is inseparable from
politics; it wants to regulate even the most insignificant everyday acts; it is
an enslaving kind of religion which from day one has been Intimately connected
with political power and they have been supporting each other in every possible
way ever since. In a similar way the Christian faith prospered and spread
rapidly after it had established a firm foothold in Rome, the centre of world
political power. Luckily, Christianity has foIlowed a different path: we went
through two extremely important and powerful experiences, namely the age of
Learning and the age of Enlightenment which tempered and softened the most
unsavoury aspect of every monotheistic religion, i.e. intolerance. The combined
effects of those two experiences, together with other traumatic events which
cost us blood and tears throughout the centuries, made Christianity what it is
today.- a mild, fairly tolerant kind of religion and largely a private war (jihad!?),
waged within our conscience, against what we consider sins or violations of a
supposedly divine law.
I do not know what goes on in your churches or chapels over there in Australia.
Here in Italy, at Mass, the priests of the Catholic Church never fail to invite
the congregation to be tolerant, to accept and love our neighbours; and
especially the new immigrants (most of them Muslims from Africa and the Middle
East). What a marked contrast to what happens in mosques throughout Muslim
Africa and the Middle East, where psychopathic clerics incite people to kill
the infidels! In our schools children are taught the values of peace and
tolerance, while in Muslim schools (in the Middle East, in the areas
administered by Arafat's Palestinian Authority and also in many Muslim schools
in Europe) they teach children that Jews are Nazis and must be eliminated! This
is the reason why I am quite pessimistic about the survival of our western
civilisation. If the theory of the survival of the fittest is anything to go
by, then we must admit that, in the long run, Islam (and the political power
which is behind it), with its strong, aggressive, intolerant, enslaving
attitude is going to win both the battle and the war against a weak, meek,
tolerant, free civilisation like ours.
Well, Bob, that's my opinion. I may be wrong and I do hope to be proved wrong.
We mustn't despair, though. Perhaps the movement to reform Islam is going to
have an effect upon what looks like a monolithic system not easily shaken, let
alone changed, and perhaps our civilisation will be saved, after all.